T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
L. Musetti
To Win
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L W L L W
Form
L W W L W L W W L LH2H: Etcheverry 5 - 6 Carabelli
They have played 29 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 14 and Carabelli winning 15. The last match between Etcheverry and Carabelli was at the Lima Challenger, 13-08-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 5 |
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 6 |
Lima Challenger(13-08-2022)
6
3
3
6
7
5
| Etcheverry | Stats | Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
| 5 | Head-to-Head | 6 |
| 51 | Ranking | 59 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 59 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 12 |
| 62% (355-217) | Career Total W/L | 63% (367-211) |
| $2,875,165 | Career Prize Money | $399,935 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 5 | Clay H2H | 4 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bublik VS Rublev PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Etcheverry VS Carabelli H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
87 of
133)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
58 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
81%
(
88 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
76 of
100)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
view more
Etcheverry VS Carabelli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | H2H Matches | 6 |
| 14 | Sets Won | 15 |
| 139 | Games Won | 143 |
| 22 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 25 |
| 2:31:23 | Average Match Time | 2:31:23 |
| 72% (632/881) | 1st Serve % | 66% (607/914) |
| 64% (403/632) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (384/607) |
| 49% (123/249) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (144/307) |
| 35% (39/110) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (38/94) |
| 42% (386/914) | Return Points Win % | 40% (355/881) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 43% (3/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 57% (7/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 43% (7/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 43% (7/3) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
14 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Corentin Moutet
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hugo Gaston
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Brandon Holt
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
8
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (355/217) | Win/Loss | 63% (367/211) |
| 59% (813/559) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (808/530) |
| 54% (7028/6001) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6676/5686) |
| 48% (43/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) |
| 66% (297/154) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (331/178) |
| 57% (12/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2276 | Aces Total | 1044 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 840 | Total Double Faults | 1273 |
| 1:53:15 | Average Match Time | 1:41:9 |
| 358.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 365.42 |
| 67% (25756/38167) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23177/37389) |
| 69% (17839/25756) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15392/23177) |
| 51% (6372/12411) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7035/14211) |
| 42% (1691/4036) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1994/4400) |
| 40% (15882/39364) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16340/37963) |
| 56% (20/16) | Slam W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 39% (12/19) | Masters W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (54/55) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (20/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (128/62) | Challenger W/L | 65% (187/99) |
| 69% (136/62) | Futures W/L | 67% (146/72) |
| 63% (334/534) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (356/556) |
| 53% (17/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 50% (96/192) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (80/145) |
| 55% (103/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (104/177) |
| 84% (352/294) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (339/301) |
| 16% (352/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (339/35) |
| 26% (219/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (239/65) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
